Captain Mark Howard Wife, Accident On Route 10 Chester, Va Today, Who Was Dr Frederick A Urquhart Class 10, Lake County, Fl Garbage Collection Schedule, 2k22 Vc Generator No Verification, Articles H

D had supplied drugs on prescriptions which were later found to be forged. It was necessary to decide if it had to be proved that they knew that their deviation was material or whether the offence was one of strict liability on this point. The judge, Parke B, ruled that he was guilty even if a nice chemical analysis was needed to discover that the tobacco was adulterated. The vet assured him it was and so the butcher offered it for sale. Harrow LBC v Shah and Shah. She was charged with being 'an alien to whom leave to land in the UK has been refused and was found in the UK'. AN OFFENCE of selling a lottery ticket to a person who had not attained the age of 16 years contrary to s 13 of the National Lottery Act 1993 and reg 3 of the National Lottery Regulations 1994 was an offence of strict liability and it was therefore unnecessary for the prosecution to prove that a person charged with such an offence knew or was reckless as to the age of the customer. These factors are well established. He had sat next to a 13 year old girl on a bus and repeatedly asked her to perform oral sex with him. The respondents were proprietors of Woods Newsagents at Uxbridge Road, Harrow. The defendants owed a newsagent's . He understood that if he was in any doubt about the age of the purchaser he should ask for proof of identity and that if still in doubt he should then refer the matter to the respondents or refuse to sell. The act of selling the ticket to someone who was actually under 16 was enough to make the defendants guilty, even though they had done their best to prevent this happening in their shop. National Distributing Company uses a periodic inventory system to track its merchandise inventory and the gross profit method to estimate ending inventory and cost of goods sold for interim periods. AQA Law AS Unit 2 Criminal Law Cases. These are. 4) The presumption can only be displaced if the statute is concerned with an issue of social concern, such as public safety. MR M BATCHELOR (instructed by Messrs Shah and Burke, London, NW10) appeared on behalf of the Appellant. In Callow v Tillstone [1900], a butcher was convicted because he sold meat in poor condition even though the meat was certified as safe by a vet before the butcher sells them and regardless of how diligent he was ensuring the safety of the meat.